Nada Fouad vs Polina Kaibekova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 11:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fouad vs P. Kaibekova

EGY
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fouad 1 - 0 Kaibekova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nada Fouad winning 2 and Polina Kaibekova winning 0. The last match between Nada Fouad and Polina Kaibekova was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nada Fouad getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fouad | 1 |
| Kaibekova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(11-05-25)
N. Fouad vs P. Kaibekova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.50% (42-38) | Career Total W/L | 52.56% (41-37) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Fouad vs P. Kaibekova Match Preview:
- Nada Fouad has shown slightly better performance on their second serve, with 39.19% points won compared to Polina Kaibekova’s 38.04%. Could this give Nada an edge in serving reliability?
- In returning second serves, Polina excels with 55.46% points won, exceeding Nada’s 52.88%. Can Polina capitalize on this strong return game to challenge Nada?
- Both players are competitive in first serve returns, but Nada leads slightly with 31.98% against Polina’s 29.75%.
- Under pressure, Nada has a distinct advantage, saving 48.26% of breakpoints while Polina manages to save 35.66%. Could this resilience in crucial moments favor Nada?
- Nada Fouad has a higher overall win rate over the past year at 62.07%, while Polina Kaibekova has a 52.17% success rate.
- Both players show similar performances on their best surface, Hard courts, with a winning percentage of 55%.
- Considering tournament level, Nada has a slightly better win rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 62.07%, compared to Polina’s 58.62%.
- Nada regularly faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average ranking of 259.66, whereas Polina’s opponents average a 289.07 ranking. Does this indicate Nada has been tested more rigorously?
- In deciding sets, Nada is more successful, winning 60% compared to Polina’s 44%, potentially giving Nada a psychological edge if the match extends.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
Both Nada Fouad and Polina Kaibekova have had strong performances in their respective tournaments. However, several key statistics suggest that Nada might have a slight edge going into this match.
Nada Fouad exhibits proficiency in handling high-pressure situations, especially in saving breakpoints and performing in deciding sets. This resilience could be pivotal in a closely contested match.
While Polina Kaibekova has shown excellent skills in returning second serves, Nada’s overall better win rate and experience against higher-ranked opponents suggest she has been more tested and could handle tougher match scenarios more effectively.
Taking into account these factors, Nada Fouad appears to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match. Her consistency and experience against challenging competition could prove critical in securing victory.
Nada Fouad vs Polina Kaibekova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fouad vs P. Kaibekova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:11:54 | Average Match Time | 1:11:54 |
| 68% (28/41) | 1st Serve % | 64% (35/55) |
| 71% (20/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 77% (10/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 55% (30/55) | Return Points Win % | 27% (11/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Fouad Recent Matches Played
P. Kaibekova Recent Matches Played

N. Fouad vs P. Kaibekova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.50% (42/38) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.56% (41/37) |
| 51.09% (94/90) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.22% (91/80) |
| 49.94% (878/880) | Games Win/Loss | 51.41% (782/739) |
| 54.29% (19/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.33% (32/28) |
| 51.11% (23/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 49 | Aces Total | 44 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 190 | Total Double Faults | 260 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:8:47 |
| 245.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 325.94 |
| 59% (1488/2541) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2004/3336) |
| 61% (912/1488) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1197/2004) |
| 39% (415/1053) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (550/1331) |
| 46% (155/337) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (209/434) |
| 46% (1205/2632) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1532/3326) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Challenger W/L | 44.00% (11/14) |
| 52.70% (39/35) | Futures W/L | 56.60% (30/23) |
| 53% (42/80) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (41/76) |
| 67% (6/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (8/13) |
| 58% (14/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 89% (38/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (42/38) |
| 11% (38/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (42/3) |
| 19% (42/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (36/3) |